a public research recordlast updated 11 September 2026
Experiments

Experimental protocols, costed and staged for laboratory execution.

What began as two open questions is now a staged, mathematically bounded experimental design. Both protocols are designed to be falsifiable, and a clean negative result would be published as readily as a positive one.

This is not a request about anyone's care.

I carry SCN5A p.Arg104Gln and live with Brugada syndrome. My clinical care rests with my physicians. These protocols exist because the questions they answer decide whether four therapeutic routes are open or closed, affecting families who carry variants in this region, several of whom do not know it yet.

Protocol 1 · Primary Mechanism Staged Decision Gate

The Matched Mechanism Triad: Total, Surface, and Current

Does the mutant protein sit out in intracellular compartments, or does it reach the surface and actively poison the working copy? Whole-cell current alone cannot separate channel abundance from channel gating. This protocol couples allele-resolved surface mass spectrometry with matched patch-clamp recordings to force the biological answer.

Cost
45,342
USD consumables; 15,500
if cell lines exist
Duration
42 wks
Stage 1 readout
at week 16
Needs
Patch-clamp rig & mass spec
The one-sided functional theorem. Under non-negative additive currents, if the ratio of measured whole-cell current to wild-type baseline falls below the ratio of wild-type surface protein (I/I0 < Sw/S0), effective wild-type channel activity is mathematically forced to drop. This proves dominant-negative impairment without requiring physical separation of the electrical signals.
Protocol 2 · Coupled Gating The Bern Single-Channel Arm

Single-Channel Coupled Patch Recording

Derived in consultation with Prof. Hugues Abriel (University of Bern). Cell-attached patch-clamp recording measures the cooperative opening of paired Nav1.5 alpha subunits. It distinguishes coupled gating from surface depletion by 32 percent without requiring mass spectrometry.

Cost
4,776
USD in cell lines;
7,132 in heart cells
Duration
33 days
recording run once
cells exist
Needs
Single-channel electrophysiology
Protocol 3 · Genetic Correction Precision Editing Proof

The Adenine Base Editing Proof (c.311G>A)

Does the designed ABE8e-SpRY base editor correct position 311 from A back to G in human cells, at what efficiency, and with what bystander edits? A genome-wide scan confirms 22 missense and 26 protein-changing candidate off-target sites, with zero sites within two mismatches.

Cost
16,670
USD minimum viable;
26,152 full panel
Duration
26 wks
hard kill-switch
at week 12
Needs
Molecular biology bench & NGS
Stated in advance. If on-target correction at week 12 is below 15 percent, or if the nearest protein-changing off-target exceeds 1 percent, the experiment stops and the result is published as a clean negative.

Construct provenance: why papers do not share a single Wild-Type

A seven-study matrix across the SCN5A literature revealed that published experiments do not use an interchangeable wild-type channel. Backgrounds differ at exon 6 (adult versus neonatal), glutamine 1077 (Q1077del versus Q1077ins), the common H558R polymorphism, and whether the beta-1 auxiliary subunit is co-expressed. Any comparison that ignores construct background risks mistaking an artifact of plasmid cloning for a property of the variant.

Tagging introduces a second distinction. Cell-surface assays frequently tag Nav1.5 with Green Fluorescent Protein at the N-terminus. The 1.41-million-atom molecular dynamics production run verified that this tag does not collapse the DEKA selectivity filter (filter radius remains 5.23 angstroms with 12 hydrating waters). However, because fusion tags can affect trafficking kinetics, untagged native peptides remain the required standard for quantitative turnover.

The mass spectrometry discovery: Lys-C versus Trypsin

The mechanism experiment requires counting wild-type and mutant channels separately at the cell surface. Antibodies cannot distinguish them because the single letter change is buried in the cytoplasmic fold. The solution is enzymatic digestion and mass spectrometry.

Standard trypsin cuts after arginine. Because position 104 is itself an arginine, trypsin destroys the site on the wild-type copy, creating an undetectable 4-amino-acid fragment while leaving a 21-amino-acid mutant fragment. The two cannot be quantified as a ratio because the mutation deletes the cleavage site.

Endoproteinase Lys-C cuts exclusively after lysine, leaving position 104 untouched. Both copies yield an identical 26-residue peptide fragment differing by exactly 28.04 Daltons in molecular weight (arginine 156.19 versus glutamine 128.15), easily resolved on standard liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry instruments.

The staged decision tree: conditional branches

Rather than funding a monolithic program all at once, the protocol proceeds in staged, decision-gated branches:

Stage 1: Matched Triad
Measures total wild-type protein, surface wild-type protein, and peak sodium current. If surface wild-type is intact while current drops, the defect is coupled gating. If surface protein falls in step with current, the defect is trafficking retention.
Stage 2: Kinetic Pulse-Chase
Triggered only if surface wild-type protein is depleted. Uses surface biotinylation turnover to test whether delivery is blocked at the endoplasmic reticulum or whether surface channels undergo accelerated endocytic degradation.
Stage 3: Febrile Challenge
Tests temperature sensitivity at 37 versus 40 degrees Celsius. Arrhythmias in Brugada syndrome are frequently unmasked by fever; this branch tests whether elevated temperature accelerates uncoupling of the loose R104Q cytoplasmic hinge.
Stage 4: Editing Off-Target Run
Runs targeted deep sequencing across the 26 protein-changing genomic off-target sites, confirming that adenine base editing leaves bystander genomic loci unperturbed.

The cost is the cells, not the measurement

Building and validating the cell lines accounts for 72 percent of the mechanism budget (15,500 dollars). Once the cell substrate exists, individual measurements cost between 4,000 and 7,000 dollars. A funder paying for one experiment answers one question; a funder supporting the stable cell lines establishes the physical substrate for all four stages.

72%
of the budget is building stable cell lines, before recording begins
15,500
USD for all three cell lines, including the 1,500 dollar benchmark line
4
independent questions answered by the same shared cell substrate

Sample sizes on the corrected comparator

Sample sizes for the non-inferiority arms were recalibrated against the corrected 45.8 percent wild-type baseline (from O'Neill's measured 2.184 two-allele scaling factor). At statistical margins of 12.5, 10, 7.5, and 5 percentage points, required sample sizes are 63, 98, 174, and 390 cells per group. Cell-to-cell variability across deposited automated patch datasets ranges from 57 to 89 percent in cell lines, and 18 to 25 percent in primary human cardiomyocytes, demonstrating that preparation quality dictates statistical power.

If you spot a flaw in the mathematical bound or the experimental design, tell me. A technical correction is worth far more than a polite yes.
If you have a patch-clamp rig or an automated planar platform, Protocol 1 is unclaimed and resolves an open biological question.
If you have a molecular biology bench, Protocol 3 is self-contained with a binding stop-rule at week 12.

The full protocol specifications, line-item spreadsheets, primer sequences, and decision trees are available on request. Write to ethan@brugada.net.